Significant Court of Appeal Judgment on Limitation of Liability in IT Contracts

Significant Court of Appeal Judgment on Limitation of Liability in IT Contracts

The Court of Appeal has handed down a significant judgment in relation to limitations of liability in IT contracts, which has relevance to commercial contracts more generally: Soteria Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom [2022] EWCA Civ 440.

The clause in question excluded claims for “loss of profit, revenue, savings (including anticipated savings)” and the question was whether this clause excluded a claim by a customer against a supplier for wasted expenditure.

At first instance, the High Court had held that it did exclude such a claim, on the basis that: (i) in reality, the losses comprised the savings, revenues and profits the customer had missed out on; and (ii) re-framing the claim as wasted expenditure did not change that position.

The Court of Appeal overturned this decision, on the basis that:

  • The natural and ordinary meaning of the words “loss of profit, revenue, savings (including anticipated savings)” did not include wasted expenditure;
  • In general, exclusion clauses should be interpreted restrictively;
  • Wasted expenditure is a different type of loss to loss of profit or revenue, wasted expenditure being far more predictable, and if the parties had intended to exclude liability for wasted expenditure, they would have done so expressly; and
  • Wasted expenditure is not simply a method of assessing or claiming lost profits or revenues.

The message to contract drafters is clear: if you want to exclude claims for wasted expenditure, you should do so expressly.

The judgment can be found here

Recent posts

Previous
Next
Autumn Budget 2024: Headlines
Read more
The Final Word
Read more
The UK's new Data (Use and Access) Bill has been introduced into Parliament
Read more
New reforms but a long wait for change: government publishes Employment Rights Bill draft
Read more
The UK's Data Protection Regulator begins its modernisation plans
Read more
A cautionary tale of lessons learnt in cases involving crypto fraud from D'Aloia v Persons Unknown Category A & Ors [2024]
Read more
‘This is a true story’: A lesson learnt from ‘Baby Reindeer’ for shows dramatising the lives of real people
Read more
Tougher protection on its way for victims of revenge porn
Read more
Proposed changes to the taxation of non-UK domiciled individuals
Read more
“Consent or pay” walls – are they here to stay?
Read more

More from this author

Previous
Next
Positive Development for Cross-Border Enforcement
Read more
Dispute Resolution in the Metaverse
Read more
How brands can adopt generative AI and avoid disputes
Read more
Digital Assets: Final Report
Read more
Service of Court documents via NFTs – no longer a novelty
Read more
High Court claim involving claimed Bitcoin creator – a significant Court of Appeal judgment
Read more
Meet you in the Metaverse
Read more
High Court claim involving claimed Bitcoin creator – the latest twist
Read more
New Podcast: Succession & Digital Assets
Read more
High Court claim involving claimed Bitcoin creator – one to watch
Read more
Tech and Sport podcast now live
Read more
Jurisdiction in 2021: LexisNexis webinar
Read more
Smart legal contracts: important update
Read more
Latest trends in data protection enforcement
Read more
Listen to our new podcast episode on NFTs
Read more
Listen to our first Digital Download podcast
Read more
Lawtech UK feasibility study
Read more
Jurisdiction post Brexit: Lugano Convention update
Read more

Share this page